(even though hes married and has a baby) Who does that?!! The bodies were nearby, said state police Capt. It then makes light of the fact that the car in which the (incriminating) hairs were found was absent of any blood. Id wanna be done with that shite quick too.. meh what do I know! Phone records dont lie.) Interesting thought about the alibi timing. On Alexs diaper bag, police found strands of the same type of hair from the car. RR, Watch the Forensic Files episode on YouTube. Rorrer was convicted at trial in March 1998 of kidnapping Joann Katrinak, 26, and her 3-month-old son, Alex, on Dec. 15, 1994, from their Catasauqua home, shooting Katrinak in the face, and leaving her and the child in the woods in Heidelberg Township. Patricias defenders also say Andrew Katrinak staged the scene at his house by prying the door and cutting the phone line. Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual. Youre absolutely right!! Tragedy also touched Patricias life. But it doesnt make a nonsense of her being the shooter, regardless of their speculation. Am I missing something? Pat is locked in a cage because shes an animal. Look into it. A-list trainer shares the ultimate do's and don'ts of workout etiquette - revealing why you should NEVER use a metal water bottle, Trump collaborates with January 6 prison choir in release of new single 'Justice for All' - which dropped ahead of his CPAC appearance, King Charles will offer Prince Harry and Meghan a Buckingham Palace apartment when they visit UK after kicking them out of Frogmore Cottage. Not normal folks obsessed ones do. Police identified the pair as Joann and Alex Katrinak. All 3 of her alibis were lies, DNA tied her to the murder, there was no sexual assault, she had a violent past, was obsessed with Andy, and was caught lying about owning a gun, which coincidentally jammed after firing once and shell cases were found on her property. (Nope. Ive found that in nearly every case, those who are firmly of the opinion shes guilty have an extremely limited knowledge of the case theyve watched one (or perhaps more) of the documentaries which make absolutely no attempt to show anything thats in Rorrers favour (theres plenty, if one bothers to look), and worse, revel in exaggerated and speculative scenes, some of which were never even mentioned at her trial. A man normally wouldnt care about killing a child, but a woman normally would have some kind of abhorrence to harming an innocent child. Another thing that stumps me is Joannes supposed good friend who said that Joanne told her she was leaving Andrew. I was so excited that I called everyone, and Joanne picked up the phone and she said Andy is married, and I said I know, then she said we have a baby, and I said yea I know, then she said dont ever call here again. Why bother with this site, which isnt for professional criminalists/forensic scientists, if youre going to get so tetchy and rude? Patricia Rorrer was a cold woman. Andrew J Katrinak, age 68, Drake, CO . The real killer is Rorrer! They tested the hair last night on Reasonable Doubt using updated technology it is definitely Patricias. You are not expressing an opinion but making an assertion or claim of fact: [I] have absolutely no doubt she was railroaded and wrongfully convicted. You are claiming innocence as fact there is no doubt shes innocent. Animals would have for sure. Over the years, she has been charged with breaking and entering, intoxication, cruelty to animals and larceny in Davidson, Randolph, Gaston, Anson and Forsyth counties, said Detective Lt. Tony Roberson of the Davidson County Sheriff's Department. All of them returned without a DNA analysis because they contained no root material. I want to keep the tons of old jewelry but Im perplexed. What a contrived case! Flaw in reasoning. Interesting points thanks for writing in (and, yikes, those poor deer that starve to death). Disclaimer: PeekYou is not a consumer reporting agency per the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Theres also the matter of a woman who suddenly remembered she saw Joann with another man at a Food Mart store five days after the disappearance. How is it that these women are paroled? ), And in another bombshell, Joanns good friend Karen Devine said Joann planned to leave Andrew after the holidays. What the prosecution failed to disclose to Rorrers defence team was that the cops, in their zeal to prove their gun theory, visited several addresses of which Rorrer was resident, dug up the gardens in which she was known to do target practice recovered several shell casings and bullets (more than 70), had them ballistically tested, but NOT ONE was found to be a match to the bullet recovered from the victim. Sorry ladiesher hair was in the car and at the scene.she murdered them. He said his heart drops a couple of feet every time it rings. Search is on. You seem to have a fragile ego. So lets get going on the recap of the Forensic Files episode A Woman Scorned, along with extra information drawn from internet research: Joann Marie OConnor was born on Oct. 11, 1968, the youngest of Sarah and David OConnors four children. How so? There is way too much doubt in this case for my comfort. A few fries short of a Happy Meal, that one. Theyre more than happy to exaggerate and speculate the details of the crime, which serves to attract more viewers who (like you) seem to be happy to believe it all. And this doesnt apply to your opinion learnt from a well-researched book, from documentaries which show and mention a great deal of facts and evidence which was never brought up at her trial. They dont need to make money??? "His wish is to attend a prearranged consultation in Dubai . Their bodies were found nearly four months later. And your contention that you (me) as ONE person are wrong, let me say that while you seem to be determined in singling me out as someone whos opinion is one against the rest, is hopelessly exaggerated. There are innocent people in prison. They were telling the truth and revealing the type of person she was, a person that definitely would kill out of jealousy and revenge. He wanted to move to Colorado and she was against it.. Three days later, Joann had plans to pick up her mother-in-law, Veronica Katrinak, to go Christmas shopping. Just one example. There was a blood-stained fingernail and hair found on the victims body, and even though (in Keith Morrisons Dateline documentary) the Asst. Perhaps that would lessen your fright. For more information governing use of our site, please review our Terms of Service. ``People who work with horses, they love 'em, rub 'em, pet 'em, and at the same time they can be firm with 'em, jerk their bits if they need to,' Hege said. Davidson County Sheriff Gerald Hege said it was a case of fatal attraction. Shes still guilty, with her hands did it or not, in regard to baby Alex. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Prosecutors offered Patricia a plea deal that would take the death penalty off the table, but she declined. Which explains why she made Joann kill the baby, or suffer from the environmental elements. Unfortunately, most people cant distinguish reality from crackpot nonsense, and theyre only more unlikely to do so, given todays social media. Yeah, no. Why would it be an irony for a person to express his opinion? Prince Andrew is refusing to leave his home at Royal Lodge and instead is demanding a mansion "fit for a King", according to royal sources. ``Her lawyer said anything we say could be used against her,' Chambers said late Tuesday night. Why? Andrew also stated that when Pat called and Joann answered she had instructed her not to call again because they were married and they were happy. Find lehighvalleylive.com on Facebook. He added: No official diagnosis has been confirmed and he is in good shape and is staying strong. As for the murder weapon, police didnt find a .22 caliber pistol on Patricias property, but an ex-boyfriend claimed that she owned one and it would always jam after one shot. Thats all for this post. They need to test that hair from Joanns hand and also that broken fingernail. Did they ever determine cause of death in the baby? After relocating to Pennsylvania, Patricia met the 6-foot-2-inch Andrew in a restaurant. Andy passed not one but two polygraph tests and had a solid alibi. And I can back up that claim by the fact I have read, watched and listened to all there is to know about this case. His doctors have requested that he returns to Dubai for further testing. I would suggest you take the time to read the book or, at least watch the documentaries which STICK TO THE FACTS, and then comment. Perhaps she used more than one gun using another/others for the target shooting than the one she killed with (and others shot with her?) They broke up in 1993. So whats your point (other than many people are stupid and you arent)? She took out the woman who replaced her. All this talk about hairs and other DNA just seems to keep deflecting away from the gun itself. Testimony from Walter Blalock contradicted Patricias claim that she never had a gun. Your assertion that most people cant distinguish reality from crackpot nonsense is in fact nonsense the reality is that most people are easily fooled by these biased documentaries who then feel its okay to spout their tripe as if its the gospel. Rorrer waived her extradition rights late Tuesday afternoon. Some people are just monsters. Sure theres DNA, but if she truly is innocent then why not advocate to find the gun. Other family members and associates include Paige Keenan . Microconidia DNA, as long as the strand is one inch long they can pull the DNA from that. There are judges, eminent lawyers and writers who are in support of her. They did this case on Reasonable Doubt last night. And about the only thing from your comment with which I can agree, is you saying thats not proof theyre right in reference to their verdict. Any subsequent proof emerging and then revealed in a book or documentary is surely something that should be taken seriously and investigated if necessary. And its argued that it has been and dismissed as insignificant or irrelevant. That did amuse me I have to say, but youre way off target there Im more than happy with my state of mind before and after reading any of these comments. Had there been a switch? Its barely visible in the picture. And about the only thing from your comment with which I can agree, is you saying thats not proof theyre right in reference to their verdict. Sign up for our newsletter to keep reading. Ironically its you who is basing your view on second-hand information, as you were not in court. It would appear you are reading all sorts of interpretations into my comments especially that I have a fragile ego, dented by others whove responded to me! And Patricia wasnt all edges. Women like Barbara Stager who killed her husband in Durham NC. Watching Reasonable Doubt right now hope they also find that she did it. They retested the hair for DNA evidence with updated technology definitely Patricias hair case closed. Some lawyers call microscopic hair analysis junk science that today wouldnt qualify as evidence in a trial like Rorrers. Theyre more than happy to exaggerate and speculate the details of the crime, which serves to attract more viewers who (like you) seem to be happy to believe it all.

Eastmont Baptist Church Pastor Search, Articles A